|
IATEFL Poland A Journal for Teachers of English ISSN 1642-1027 Vol. 7, Issue 1 (February 2007) |
|
Lesson Ideas |
||||||||||||||||
| |
|
|
|
WEBLOGS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING by Galina Kavaliauskienė Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania Galina_Kavaliauskiene@yahoo.com Introduction Currently majority of learners are well familiar with
the Internet and enjoy using it for a variety of purposes such as searching for
information, writing e-mails, communicating via Skype service, using online chat-rooms
and forums, etc. Recent innovations of e-learning include individual
websites, or weblogs (blogs for short), which have an immense potential as a
valuable tool for teaching writing in a second language. The advantages and disadvantages of weblogging have
been described by A. P. Campbell (2003), D.
Eastment (2005), J. Egbert (2006), B. Goldwin-Jones (2003), A. Johnson (2004),
G. Stanley (undated online). The major advantages of weblogging in language
classes comprise writing and instant publishing online, awareness of having a
web wide readership, individual reading practice, developing critical skills,
and creating an e-portfolio of students work. Common disadvantages are the loss
of interest by some learners, forgotten usernames and passwords (this leads to
inability to log in and edit one’s entries), failure to read and comment on
peers’ written work, outdated weblogs. Neither teachers nor learners need any knowledge of
HTML for weblogging. Weblogs are easily linked and cross-linked to create
online communities. Self-publishing promotes learners’ responsibility and a
sense of ownership because students are aware of writing for a real audience. In spring of 2006 the author of this contribution
initiated and conducted application of weblogging in English classes taught by
colleagues. The research into the use of weblogs and its implications is
published online (Kavaliauskienė, Anusienė, and Mažeikienė,
2006). Lesson
plan Level: pre-intermediate
and above Time:
at least 3 classes of 90 minutes (could be more, if the teacher and students
find activities beneficial to teaching/learning) Aims: The
students 1
learn how to create an individual website 2
use individual websites for instant online publishing
of their written contributions (written work may comprise essays, summaries,
description of learning experience, etc.) 3
read other students’ contributions 4
write their responses to peers’ written work in the ‘comments’
sections of the weblogs 5
share individual opinions on published written work
in a follow up class discussion Resources 1
A classroom with a computer for each student 2
Access to the Internet 3
Each student must have an e-mail address (it is a
requirement by a blogger service software; otherwise a weblog cannot be created) 4
Individual earphones in each computer (for online
listening assignments) Possible
problems No access to the Internet on the scheduled day due to
the server failure Procedure -
Use a free service available online http://www.blogger.com. This service is
reliable and easy to use. -
Prior to class, set up a teacher’s weblog. It will
help the teacher to go over the stages and see possible pitfalls such as
inapplicable username (that already exists) or password, which must be at least
6 characters long. -
Prior to the
online session, explain the steps of setting up a weblog in detail: 1) create
an account, 2) name your weblog, 3) choose a template. Write down the major
steps on the board. It will save the time online – students will know exactly
what to do, particularly if they encounter unfamiliar vocabulary. -
During class, suggest that students think of
appropriate username and password. -
During class, suggest that learners use the first
letter of the Christian name and their full surname for titling (naming)
individual weblogs, e.g. http://gkavaliauskiene.blogspot.com,
or just their surname, e.g. http://mazeikiene.blogspot.com.
It might help to avoid rejected titles by a blogger software and simplify
teacher’s work linking students’ weblogs with his/her own. Personalizing
weblogs gives learners a sense of ownership and facilitates recollection of
weblog’s title. -
During the Internet session, have all students open
the http://www.blogger.com site and start
setting up individual websites. -
Emphasize that students must write down their
username and password. If they forget this information, they will not be able
to enter their weblogs and edit them (i.e. they will have to create a new
weblog in order to continue weblogging) -
As soon as students completed the task of creating
their weblogs, give them the first assignment. It might be any task that the
teacher wants students to do in class. A useful tip: whatever the assignment –
it should be finished during class. Extra homework is not advisable at this
stage. -
A writing assignment is the best task for the start.
It might be any task that is relevant to learners, such as writing a summary of
the text they have read, or sharing experience of participating in the sport event,
or describing their plans for the coming weekend, etc. A useful tip: creative writing is more
enjoyable than a routine activity, but it should not Interfere with the course curriculum and
be a sheer waste of classroom time. -
Follow up stage offline is a class discussion of the
experience of setting up weblogs and writing activity. Brainstorm learners’
feedback on the first weblogging activity: difficulties, likes, dislikes,
needs, future plans, etc. -
Another online session might be devoted to reading
peers’ written entries and writing comments in the appropriate columns of
individual weblogs. Writing comments on peers’ written work is a must which allows
learners to collaborate and highlights the notion of writing for the audience. -
Encourage students to personalize their websites by
placing pictures or giving personal information. However, if the learners are
reluctant to do this, the teacher should not insist upon it in order to avoid
negative emotions. -
The teacher should upload students’ weblogs into his
/ her weblog through the ‘link’ procedure. It would allow the teacher to enter
learner’s individual weblog and write comments (but not edit any entries). In
other words, the teacher’s feedback on written work is provided in the
‘comments’ columns of learners’ individual websites. Unfortunately, this makes some extra
work for teachers, but it is worth noting that teacher’s feedback does not have
to involve correction of errors – it is sufficient to point them out and ask
students to introduce corrections. Such an approach develops learners’
awareness of language usage. -
The next online session might be online listening
using, for instance a diversity of available. A podcast is the name of a
digital recording of a radio broadcast or similar programs, which are published
on the internet as MP3 files. A good example of related links is http://iteslj.org/links/ESL/Listening/Podcasts. Two important
aspects in choosing a podcast are relevance to students and transferability (P.
Constantine, 2007). -
Recommend your students to open and scrutinize well
organized blogs. For example, http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/ http://www.graemedavis.blogspot.com/. -
Another possibility is an autonomous search for interesting
weblogs using a Google search engine. At present Google search gives 71,300,000
sources (January 2007). It is estimated that there are 60,000,000 weblogs
online. This activity might be educational for those learners who would like to
contribute more sophisticated contributions to their websites. Ready-to-do
resource for weblogging lesson First online
session -
Instruct students on the procedure of setting up a
weblog. -
Set up individual weblogs using online service http://www.blogger.com. -
Give students a short writing assignment, e.g.
Self-assessment of Language Skills (Appendix
1). Learners describe their strengths and weaknesses in Reading, Writing,
Listening, and Speaking. -
Other themes for writing might be in accordance with
the concrete curriculum in your English classes. For example, in my English for
Specific Purposes (Law) classes I used the following: 1. Freedom of Speech in Different
Countries; 2. Copyright and Its Infringement; 3. Child Abuse – Violation of
Human Rights; 4. Jury System: Advantages and Disadvantages. -
Limit the scope of individual
contribution – up to 200-300 words. Monitor students’ activity by giving
individual attention or advice when necessary. Remind learners to publish their
entry by clicking “post” button, otherwise a contribution will be lost. -
Offline stage – get learners’ feedback on
their difficulties, likes, dislikes, needs, and wishes. Note them down. It will help
you to improve e-activities in the future.
Second online
session -
Arrange reading peers’ written entries and writing
comments in individual blogs by learners. -
Arrange individual online listening practice. See an
example in Appendix 2. You can also use either of the following websites: iteslj.org/links/ESL/Listening/Podcasts or http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/. -
Ask learners to describe their listening experience
in the second entry to the weblog.Encourage them to evaluate their
performance and discuss strengths and weaknesses that occurred in listening, comprehension of vocabulary, pronunciation. -
Offline activity: class discussion of
listening problems, clarification of problematic vocabulary, future plans for improving listening skills. Follow up
sessions – information for thought To some
extent, weblogs can be viewed as e-portfolios, i.e. collections of students’
written work, so the online sessions might be used for any writing assignments
that teachers plan in the language course. Similarly to paper-portfolios, e-contributions
are useful provided that learners reflect on their performance. Students’ reflections (a few excerpts from the learners’
weblogs) are reproduced in Appendix 3. Encourage your learners to analyze their
contributions to weblogs critically, to note both positive and negative
features and stimulate any creative activities that learners would initiate. Teacher’s
work -
Upload learners’ weblogs to your own weblog using
“links” procedure. -
Go over learners’ entries. Write your comments. Do
not correct writing errors, just point them out and encourage learners to
edit their writing by introducing corrections. The brief analysis of students’
errors is given in Appendix 4. Sharing
experience Here I would like to share my experience with
teachers who might be interested in applying weblogs in English classes. For
the sake of diversity, in my weblogging practice, I used online listening
exercises to develop skills of listening by giving students individual
practice. An example of the assignment is shown in the Appendix 2. Afterwards,
students described their experience in their weblogs. Generally, individual listening
practice seems to be more beneficial to learners than class listening. Individual listening allows each learner to work at
his / her own pace and listen to a passage as many times as they want to. In
collective class listening practice, there are always a few students whose
listening skills are better developed, and they inhibit their peers from extra
practice. The point is that shy students often complain of difficulties in
listening exercises. The chief complaint is “the native speakers in recordings
speak too fast”. De facto, it reveals learners’ inability to process
information they hear fast enough to understand it. This explains why I emphasize
the importance of individual listening online. There are a number of good websites for developing listening
skills. The best to start with is http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/.
Go to For teachers site (on the left hand side of the page), enter Previous
plans: 2006 2005. Then students can
choose any news item in the list they want to. Each online lesson includes a
reading text, listening practice, pronunciation exercise, vocabulary and its
definitions followed by the True / False and matching exercises. Implications The implications of weblogging activity are numerous.
First, application of weblogs in English classes can be used for raising
language awareness and learner development. Second, weblogging can enhance the
students’ motivation due to the novelty and diversity of possible learning
activities. Third, learning at one’s own pace can help learners overcome their
fear of making errors and enhance self-esteem. Fourth, weblogging is an
enjoyable activity, which attracts the vast majority of students who are keen
on having their own website. Fifth, the teacher can provide individual feedback
to each learner, and students can receive feedback not only from classmates but
also from any Internet reader. Finally, there is an opportunity for learners’
reflection on their performance and achievements. In spite of the learners’
products in weblogs being not perfect, they show how students learn and what
teachers teach. Orienting learners toward personal publishing on weblogs can
help prepare students for communication in the networked world. References Campbell,
A. P. (2003). Weblogs
for Use with ESL Classes. The Internet TESL
Journal, 9(2),
February 2003. Retrieved 10th March 2006 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Campbell-Weblogs.html.
Constantine,
P. (2007). Podcasts: Another Source for Listening Input. The Internet TESL Journal, 13 (1). Retrieved 29th January 2007, from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Constantine-PodcastListening.html.
Eastment,
D. (2005). Blogging. ELT Journal, 59 (4), 358-361. Egbert,
J. (2006). The End of Call and How to Achieve It. Teaching English with Technology: A Journal for Teachers of English, 6 (2), May 2006. Retrieved 20th December
2006 from http://www.iatefl.org.pl/call/j_key24.htm.
Godwin-Jones,
B. (2003). Blogs and Wikis: Environments for On-line Collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 12-16. Retrieved 10th March 2006
from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/emerging/default.html. Johnson,
A. (2004). Creating a Writing Course Utilizing Class and Student Blogs. The Internet TESL Journal, 10 (8). Retrieved 10th February 2006 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Johnson-Blogs/.
Kavaliauskienė, G.,
Anusienė, L., and Mažeikienė, V. (2006). Weblogging: Innovations
for Communication in English Class. Electronic
Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2), 220-233. Retrieved 18th
December 2006 from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v3n22006/kavali.htm.
Stanley,
G. (2006). Blogging for ELT. Retrieved 5th April 2006 from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/resources/blogging.shtml.
Appendix
1. ASSIGNMENT:
WRITING A SELF-ASSESSMENT ESSAY In your
BLOGGER website write about your achievements in learning English. Mention your
skills and performance in: -
READING -
WRITING -
LISTENING -
SPEAKING -
VOCABULARY -
MAKING PRESENTATIONS -
PARTICIPATING IN DISCUSSIONS Also write
WHAT activities in English classes you LIKE / DISLIKE and WHY. Appendix 2. ASSIGNMENT: INDIVIDUAL ONLINE LISTENING AND WRITING Log on to the website http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/ TASK
1 1 Go to the section UP TO DATE (prof. David Crystal’s
website on new words) 2
Choose one topic (on the left hand side of the page) 3
Listen to prof. D. Crystal‘s recording as many times
as you want, but do not read the tapescript 4
Read the tapescript and listen again 5
Note down the new words (if there are any) 6
Go to your blog site 7
Write down your opinion on your listening experience.
Don‘t forget to post it in your blog. TASK
2 1
Choose another topic on the LEARNING ENGLISH page 2
Listen but not read 3
Read the tapescript and listen again 4
Note down new vocabulary 5
Write your opinion on the online listening practice
in your blog. Don‘t forget to post it. Appendix
3. LEARNERS’
REFLECTIONS ON INDIVIDUAL LISTENING PRACTICE Here are a few excerpts from students’ weblogs. Errors
have not been corrected. http://bozenaa.blogspot.com/
Today
we have done a very interesting task during our English classes. We were doing
listening tasks online. It was a little bit difficult to listen to the
recordings because all the students listened at once. Well, while listening to
the recording I learned many new things. I liked such kind of task very much.
During the task I not only practiced listening but I also found out much new
information. I liked such kind of task very much. Hole in the wall. Now I would like to share my impression
about this task. Firstly, I had to choose one topic and listen to this
recording .I chose,, hole in the wall’’. During the listening I heard the
meaning of this phrase. So Hole in the wall means an automatic cash dispenser.
However I heard some unknown phrases such as hypheps, hither or oomph, which I
translated from the vocabulary. So, this task was useful. However, I had some
difficulties, because everybody were hearing different recordings at the same
time. Because of that I had to listen my topic several times. After that I read
the text and then I understood more. Summing all up it seems that this task was
and useful and a bit difficult, but very interesting. Listening for this text was more
difficult, because there were a lot of unknown words. However it was quite easy
to guess those words from the context. In generally, I am not satisfied with my
listening skills, they’re terrible! http://javinaite.blogspot.com/ Hole-in-the Wall. This listening task was quite interesting and I found
it not so difficult as I imagined before. In my opinion it is very useful to
experience such tasks as they improve my listening skills. There were some new
words, which helped to improve my English. I would like to have more such
listening practice in the future. Spam. Today I had a listening task online from the www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish
page. I chose the topic about the spam, because this word is very often met in
our today’s life. This little, but very jumpy word keys up me every time I
check my e-mail. So I was curious to know something more about it. I have found
out more than I expected. Not only the meaning of the word, but it’s origin as
well. It shocked me a little. I even couldn’t imagine that this word has any
relation to the word “meat”. That’s great J To
tell the truth, it was a little bit difficult to hear the speaker, because
there were other 8 girls trying to do the same. Fortunately, there was a text
written as well, so it made easier all the work. I even wondered that there was
no words I couldn’t understand. It means only one, I was lucky today by
choosing this topic, or my English isn’t so poor as I thought J As many as I could hear, the pronunciation was
understandable too. Maybe it because of the voice of the man, I don’t want to flatter
myself, but it can be my English listening ability is getting better and
better. One thing I can say I really enjoyed this work. Appendix 4. ANALYSIS
OF WRITTEN WORK Learners’
written errors can be divided into ‘interlingual errors’, i.e. errors that
occur between English and the mother tongue, and ‘intralingual errors’, i.e.
those that occur within the language being learned. The causes of the errors
are: mother tongue interference, overgeneralization, interference from items
within English - cross association and false analogy. Errors might have more than one source; there
could be two or more causes operating at the same time. Errors made by
the students do not demonstrate any difficulties in understanding the course
material. Many errors are made because of the students' carelessness or
absent-mindedness. Some examples of spelling errors: a) personal
pronoun "I" and words – “English”, “British”, “American” are not
written in capital letters; b) some
plural nouns ending in "y" – e.g. sumarys. Other common errors are
missing articles, confusing the usage of the possessive case, missing –s in the
3rd person singular in present Simple, use of double negatives,
misplaced apostrophes, subject-verb disagreement, usage of wrong prepositions
and tenses; confused vocabulary, misuse of the infinitive and “to be”. These
errors have been due to mother tongue interference. Word order mistakes are
also frequent, and they are caused by the fact that word order in the students’
mother tongue is rather flexible. Knowing/understanding the cause of errors can help
teachers to help learners. When teachers are aware of learners’ problems they
are in a better position to decide what to do. The action teachers take can
depend on a lot of different variables: whether the error is frequent or not,
if it is important for communication or not, whether it takes place in a
controlled or uncontrolled activity, if it is an individual problem or
widespread amongst the group. | ||||||||||||
|
Last Updated: February 20, 2007 |