|
IATEFL Poland A Journal for Teachers of English ISSN 1642-1027 Vol. 6, Issue 2 (May 2006) |
|
Guest Editor’s Introduction |
||||||||||||||||
| |
|
|
|
PROCEEDS
OF WEBHEADS IN ACTION ONLINE CONVERGENCE: VOLUME 1 By Vance Stevens, Guest Editor Petroleum Institute Abu Dhabi, UAE vstevens @
pi.ac.ae It is
interesting to consider how the set of papers in this volume came to be. This is not just another proceeds of a
conference put on by people who gather together once every year or two but with
little connection to one another apart from interest and expertise in a common
subject area. I hope you have paused
on reading that assertion. What kind of
proceeds is it then? What sets this volume apart from other compilations of
articles published in the genre of proceeds? It’s not
that there is anything wrong with infrequent contact over interest and
expertise in a common subject area, and proceeds very similar to this one might
emerge under such conditions. But there
is latent potential in the quality of collaboration that can be generated
through greater familiarity, and it turns out that online environments address
this very aspect of human interaction. So, one crucial difference between these
proceeds and others is that the conference in this case was organized and run
by participants in a community of practice called Webheads <http://webheads.info>. Whereas few authors of these papers have
ever met face to face, for the most part they know one another quite well
through interaction online, and the mutual respect arising through frequent
opportunities to interact productively over time has brought these authors to
converge on an online conference resulting in turn in these proceeds. By definition, a community of practice is a loose association of peers who meet to further their knowledge of a given practice, in this case the nature and delivery of online learning using free and open source Internet tools. This community has been exploring these tools with each other for several years now, and its members have engaged in numerous collaboration projects and become familiar with each other’s work and more importantly, personalities. It’s the personality factor as much as the work ethic that contributes so much to this group’s cohesion and which has led it to challenge itself with putting on a completely free worldwide online conference. The significance of that ground-breaking endeavor can be gauged from the quality of papers in this volume, which is part one of a two-part proceeds. This
conference was conceived and implemented in ways unlike most other conferences.
Normally, conferences are mounted by entities ranging from universities to
professional associations which in most cases put on conferences face to face
but occasionally online. In such cases,
there are almost always budgetary concerns: either there is a physical plant to
rent or maintain, or in the case of purely online conferences money is required
to pay staff and support infrastructure, which means that fees are charged
participants and used in part to hire speakers to attract more participants. Our
conference, as holds true for our community of practice in general, relied on
no funding whatsoever, nor were any fees charged to participants. All organizers and presenters, including
keynote presenters with celebrity status, donated their time and expertise for
what turned out to be a remarkably worthwhile cause (see Stevens 2005a and 2005b for reports on the results of
a survey of participant reactions). The
data cited in these reports suggest that although presenting and participating
in an online conference such as this one was new to most of the interactants
(and incidentally, especially challenging to many of the presenters),
impressions of questionnaire respondents were predominantly positive regarding
almost all aspects of the conference.
Questionnaire respondents found the interfaces easy to use, surprisingly
manageable, and intuitively navigable.
They found live, empathetic help when needed. They thought the quality of the presentations was surprisingly
high. If they had not been a part of
the Webheads CoP before the conference, they felt predisposed to learn more, to
get to know the others in the environment better. If they were already participants in Webheads then they
solidified friendships and developed a deeper appreciation for the creative
potential of online communities of practice. The
community realized that the presenters whose work appears here would be
challenged by some of the unique aspects of online presentations and
conferences. The call for papers was put out to the world of academics at
large, and was responded to by a wide spectrum of practitioners in addition to
Webheads members; but because we had virtually limitless time and space for
presentations (72 hours or slots available over three days, option to spill
into additional days, no constraints on day or night since it was always
daytime somewhere for some of our worldwide audience), the referees were able
to accept almost all of the proposals submitted with enough detail for the
proposal to be considered a serious one. We then developed a coaching system,
where needed, to help colleagues develop their text-based proposals into viable
online presentations. In the end we fielded 46 presentations spread out over
the three 24-hour days of the conference. So this
introduction is converging on several threads.
You have gathered that the conference, or convergence as we called it,
was highly experimental. (One of our
members, Elderbob Brannan <http://elderbob.com/>,
suggested calling it a convergence to make the point that we were converging
numerous technologies and communities, and the appellation stuck). It was also
of high quality, as you will judge when you read these proceeds and those in
the next volume. And characteristic of
our CoP, it was also friendly in a way that is unique to online environments
and generally unfathomable to those who have never experienced one. For the uninitiated the experience was no
doubt revelatory. For ongoing
interactants in the group, the convergence was a challenging, surprising,
reaffirming, yet logical outcome of long-time online collaboration through a
CoP. We hope you enjoy this first of our two volumes of proceeds. Volume Two is due to appear this June as a Special Edition of Teaching English with Technology. And we hope you will join us at our next global, free, entirely online, Webheads in Action Online Convergence tentatively scheduled for May, 2007. References Stevens,
V. (2005a). APACALL Co-sponsors Webheads in Action Online Convergence November
18-20, 2005. Innovative Language Learning,
8, 2005 (APACALL Newsletter). Retrieved May 2, 2006 from: http://www.apacall.org/news/Newsletter8.pdf
. Stevens,
V. (2005b). Behind the scenes at the Webheads in Action Online Convergence,
November 18-20, 2005. . TESL-EJ, 9
(3), December 2005. Retrieved May 2, 2006 from: http://tesl-ej.org/ej35/int.html. | ||||||||||||
|
Last Updated: May 10, 2006 |